Barack Obama is now attacking Gianna Jessen and BornAliveTruth for this ad:
Obama’s response:
Besides the fact that his attacks on John McCain are untrue, he’s also clearly misrepresenting the truth about his own votes. We’ve talked about his infanticide votes in the past. Barack Obama can’t re-write his record now. So he slings mud and calls McCain names, and attacks the ad from an independent group and its messenger. But Gianna Jessen is tough, and she’s not going to take Barack’s vile attacks lying down.
“Mr. Obama is clearly blinded by political ambition given his attack on me this week. All I asked of him was to do the right thing: support medical care and protection for babies who survive abortion – as I did 31 years ago. He voted against such protection and care four times even though the U.S. Senate voted 98-0 in favor of a bill identical to the one Obama opposed. In the words of his own false and misleading ad, his position is downright vile. Mr. Obama said at the recent Saddleback Forum that the question of when babies should get human rights was above his pay grade. Such vacillation and cowardice would have left me to die if his policies were in place when I was born. Thank God they were not.”
Barack Obama thinks children are a punishment, and voted four times against born alive infant protection, something the U.S. Senate supported 98-0 (even Hillary Clinton and Ted Kennedy didn’t oppose born alive protections). Now he attacks an abortion survivor for speaking the truth?
Thank you Gianna for your voice and for speaking out against this abhorrent practice. I hope people are paying attention.
For more information about Born Alive Infant Protection and Barack Obama’s despicable record in this regard, please visit BornAliveTruth.org and Jill Stanek’s website.
H/T: Michelle Malkin
Message to Barack Obama:
This subject is not going to disappear. You can run all the ads you want accusing Senator McCain of vile or unfair lies, but we are bringing this to the attention of voters. Your unwillingness to allow medical protections in an infant bill where the child is born alive after an abortion could be likened to “premeditated murder” because you are assuming in the bill that the child is born alive, yet denying medical care needed to any newborn, thus causing death by refusing medical care (murder) of a child in the future born alive through abortion (premeditation). It’s really gotta take some big balls to think you can justify something so heinous.